CALL US:  847-940-2800

REQUEST A CONSULTATION

Menu

General Information

Divorce Involving Special Needs Children: Legal Considerations Under Illinois Law

, , , , , , , , 0

Divorces involving children with special needs present distinct legal and practical challenges. Family law practitioners in Illinois must navigate not only the traditional aspects of custody (now referred to as “allocation of parental responsibilities”), parenting time, and support, but also the unique needs of these vulnerable children whose care often requires additional planning, resources, and long-term considerations.

Allocation of Parental Responsibilities and Parenting Time
Under Illinois law (750 ILCS 5/600 et seq.), courts must allocate parental decision-making authority in four key areas: education, healthcare, extracurricular activities, and religious upbringing. When a child has special needs, healthcare and education decisions become particularly significant.
Judges often look for highly detailed parenting plans that address:
• Coordination of medical care, therapies, and educational services (including IEP or 504 Plan meetings).
• Transportation logistics for medical appointments or therapy sessions.
• Consistency in therapeutic interventions and treatment plans.
• Plans for emergency medical situations.
• Specialized childcare or supervision needs.
Courts expect parents to demonstrate a clear understanding of the child’s current and future needs. A failure to address these details may lead to additional litigation or modifications post-divorce.

Child Support and Special Needs
Illinois calculates child support using an income shares model (750 ILCS 5/505). However, when a child has special needs, courts may deviate from the standard formula to account for extraordinary expenses such as:
• Ongoing medical treatments
• Therapies (occupational, speech, behavioral, etc.)
• Specialized equipment and adaptive technology
• Private education or specialized programs not covered by public services
• Respite care or personal attendants
Practitioners should present detailed evidence of these expenses, including documentation from medical providers, therapists, and educational professionals.


Support Beyond Age of Majority
Illinois law (750 ILCS 5/513.5) allows for the continuation of child support beyond the age of majority if the child is physically or mentally disabled and not otherwise emancipated. This is a crucial provision for families of children with lifelong care needs.
Attorneys should help clients consider:
• The potential need for adult guardianship or powers of attorney.
• Coordination with government benefits such as SSI, Medicaid, and vocational services.
• Establishing a special needs trust to preserve eligibility for public benefits while providing supplemental resources.

Guardianship and Decision-Making in Adulthood
As a child with disabilities reaches adulthood, parents may need to pursue adult guardianship under the Illinois Probate Act (755 ILCS 5/11a). This can ensure that parents (or designated guardians) retain the legal authority to make critical decisions on behalf of the child.

Collaborative Approaches and Expert Involvement
Divorces involving special needs children often benefit from collaborative law, mediation, or the inclusion of child specialists, medical experts, and financial advisors. The involvement of a special needs planner can help families navigate complex financial and legal structures such as:
• Special needs trusts (third-party and first-party)
• ABLE accounts
• Long-term care planning

Conclusion
For Illinois family law practitioners, cases involving children with special needs require heightened diligence, a thorough understanding of both family and disability law, and a commitment to long-term planning. Attorneys must help their clients anticipate not only the immediate post-divorce period but also the evolving needs that may extend well into adulthood.

LEGISLATIVE UPDATES: CHILDHOOD TRAUMA

, , , , , , , 0

In August, Governor Pritzker signed a bill into law to help schools properly address childhood trauma with trained teachers, administrators and staff. At least 40% of children in Illinois have experienced at least one adverse childhood experience. At least 10% of youth across the state have had three or more adverse experiences. Hispanic and Black children are impacted at a much higher rate.

Adverse childhood experiences or ACES, are potentially traumatic events that occur in childhood (0-17 years). For example:

  • Experiencing violence, abuse or neglect
  • Witnessing violence in the home or community
  • Having a family member attempt or die by suicide.

Also included are aspects of the child’s environment that can undermine their sense of safety, stability , and bonding such as growing up in a household with:

  • Substance abuse problems
  • Mental health problems
  • Instability due to parental separation or household members being in jail or prison.

ACES are linked to chronic health problems, mental illness, and substance abuse problems in adolescence and adulthood. ACEs can also negatively impact education, job opportunities, and earning potential.

            In an effort to address the impact of trauma on children, the Illinois State Board of Education will be required to develop a Children’s Adversity Index to measure community childhood trauma exposure for kids three to 18 years old by May 31, 2025. Although some school districts are providing mental health services to address trauma these interventions are not systemic and depend on the efforts of individual community leaders and school districts. Teacher institutes will be required to provide instruction of trauma-informed practices.

BULLYING

Public Act 103-47 amends the School Code provisions to include the definition of bullying targeting based on physical appearance, socioeconomic status, academic status, pregnancy, parenting status, and homelessness. This law requires that a school district’s bullying procedures for informing parents or guardians of all students in the alleged incident of bullying within 24 hours after the school’s administration is made aware of the incident. Requires that all individual instances of bullying, as well as threats, suggestion, or instances of self-harm be reported to the parents or legal guardians of those involved under the guidelines provided. Effective June 9, 2023.

FAMILY LAW

Guardian Ad Litem: Public Act 103-126 amends the guardian ad litem (GAL) statute in the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act to clarify and resolve issues with the duties of the GALs. These changes are as follows: 1)Requiring a written report or recommendations not less than 30 days before a final hearing or trial unless the court directs otherwise. It also allows the judge to direct that the GAL propose an allocation order in addition to the written report or recommendations. This is to prevent having a surprise GAL recommendation at trial with no written proposal in advance. 2) It also allows for the written report or recommendations are to be admitted in evidence without the need for any foundation. 3) Gives the GAL, at the discretion of the court, to : a) to be present for all proceedings, including in camera examinations of the child; b) issue subpoenas for records as part of his or her investigation; and c) file pleadings related to procedural matters. Effective Jan.1, 2024.

Helpful Tips Tag. Chat Speech Bubble Banner With Questions. Educ

Advocacy Tips for Parents Staying on Top of Your Child’s Education

, , , , , , , 0

  1. Get organized
    • Buy a folder or two. Set up an organizational system that works for you. Keep Records of communication, emails, and work samples.
    • Be clear about the communication system your school uses to track your child’s progress and assignments. If this isn’t sufficient based on your child’s needs communicate that to the school personnel and work on an alternate or supplementary system.
  2. Communication
    • Most communication should be in writing- preferably via email.
    • Be polite and professional in all communication. This does not require you to agree but don’t make it personal.
    • Be clear and concise. Long emails don’t get read.
    • Agree on the frequency of communication.
    • When appropriate, use a checklist rather than a long narrative.
    • Agree on which team member from the school will be the point of contact.
    • If it is urgent, pick up the phone.
  3. IEP meetings
    • Develop a “proposed agenda”. Circulate this to the IEP team in advance.
    • Agree on the length of the meeting and who will participate.
    • This is not the time to play “gotcha.”
    • Prioritize your concerns and what you hope your child will achieve this school year.
    • Leave the meeting with an action plan and agree on who will be responsible for any follow up.

Resources: www.understood.org

Our office is available for consultation and or representation in special education, bullying, and educational concerns. Please feel free to email us at mmoran@grundlaw.com or call (312)-640-0500.

Specific Learning Disabilities / Dyslexia and the Science of Reading

, , , 0

Twenty-six years ago, I opened the Child and Family Law Center of the North Shore, now a division of Grund & Leavitt). Some of you who have known me well are aware that one of the inspirations for this law practice was my journey with my own dyslexic son. We lived in one of the most affluent and well-funded school districts in Illinois. Despite these demographics my son was not learning to read. He disliked school in first and second grades and there was little if any progress in his ability to read. He was still struggling with letter recognition and misspelled his name.  All of the experts we saw recommended the Orton -Gillingham method for dealing with his dyslexia. [1]*Schools were then as they are now reluctant to use the word dyslexia in describing a student with a reading disorder. I was fortunate that I was able to find (after a number of months on a waiting list) a skilled O-G reading tutor. Five days a week I drove 45 minutes each way to allow my son to receive an hour of instruction.

He did learn to read but not until late 5th grade at great expense to his self-esteem but with his love of learning intact. Today he is an avid reader, loved college and all things to do with learning. However, in my naiveté, I assumed that once schools understood the need for research-based interventions and the importance of early intervention for all readers this would result in massive curriculum reform. I also saw that at least this aspect of my special education practice would be a non-issue, eliminated by the wide-spread recognition of the need for science- based reading instruction.

In the year 2000, the National Reading Panel issued their report and outlined the key elements of reading instruction, notably phonics-based instruction. [2] For a time, I brought this book to IEP meetings where I represented students who were identified as dyslexic. Some educators had not heard of this study, but others had and nodded in recognition across the IEP table. However, the interventions for struggling readers remained unchanged at most school districts.

I filed due process requests for parents who were forced to seek out private schools that offered the interventions they were seeking. This litigation often resulted in a positive change for that family but didn’t usually result in district wide changes. To be clear, litigation is expensive and parents were desperate. They understood that their child’s failure to be a solid reader would have a life long negative impact. Often the choice becomes ,should parents pay for a tutor or pay legal fees for a due process hearing. Like with other disabilities, success in litigation which resulted in enhanced services and support for an individual child did not result in the hoped for system wide reform and it appeared that most school districts took the results of the National Reading Panel as suggestions rather than a call to action that they would ignore.

Several times this school year I have been at IEP meetings where when asked (as I almost always do) what research-based interventions the district was providing or proposing, the answer was often an eclectic mixture of interventions with no discussion of why this would be effective for this student. In a number of meetings the answer has been “we use the Sally Calkins curriculum.” At a recent IEP I asked if they had gotten the “ memo” discrediting this intervention. Expecting to hear that they had not heard this I offered to look up the New York Times article while we were in the meeting. I was told by the administrator in charge of the meeting that they were well- aware of that information but would not be changing the curriculum since a study needed to be undertaken if they were to consider another intervention. I was told the process would take a year or two. This is what they had and was all that was available. These problems are not confined to under-performing or poor districts. Unfortunately, the most resistance to research-based interventions for students can be found in school districts in wealthy areas where change is slow to come.

This is a national emergency. Approximately one in three children in the United States cannot read at a basic level of comprehension. The outcomes are particularly troubling for Black and Native American children. [3]

Steps to take as a Parent:

  • Request a meeting with the school in writing.
  • If you suspect your child is struggling to read request a case study evaluation in writing.
  • If your school will not evaluate or is taking a wait to fail approach, if possible, seek out a private evaluation.
  • Keep track of your child’s work and test scores.
  • Be informed
  • Seek help from an attorney or advocate to assist in securing needed services.

Selected parent resources are listed below.

[1] Rose, Tessie E; Zirkel ( December 7, 2018). “Orton-Gillingham Methodology for Students with Reading Disabilities”. (https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext /EJ1785952.pdf) (PDF)

[2] Langenberg,Ph.D,Daniel. “Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence -Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction”. (https://wwwnichd.nih.gov/publications /pubs/nrp/documents/documents/report.pdf) (PDF)National Reading Panel

[3] https://www.newyorktimes.com/2023/04/16/us/science-of-reading-literacy -parents.html

law

NEW GUIDANCE HELPS SCHOOLS SUPPORT STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES and AVOID DISCRIMINATORY USE OF DISCIPLINE

, , , , , , , 0

On July 19,2022, the Department of Education for Civil Rights (OCR) and Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (OSERS) released guidance to assist public elementary and secondary schools fulfill their responsibilities to meet the needs of students with disabilities and avoid discriminatory use of student discipline.

These newly released resources are the most comprehensive guidance on the civil rights of students with disabilities concerning student discipline and build on the Department’s continued efforts to support students through pandemic recovery.

            “ All students deserve to have their rights protected, and schools deserve greater clarity on how they can avoid the discriminatory use of discipline”, said U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona. “ Too often, students with disabilities face harsh and exclusionary disciplinary action at school. The guidance we’re releasing today will help ensure that students with disabilities are treated fairly and have access to supports and services to meet their needs-including their disability- based behavior.  We also expect that districts utilize the American Rescue Plan dollars to build capacity, provide professional learning opportunities for educators and school leaders and hire additional staff. These resources will also help schools live up to their legal obligations, support an equitable recovery for all our students, and make sure that students with disabilities get the behavioral support and special education services they need to thrive. “

            The new releases reflect the concern, particularly in light of the prevalence of student mental health issues associated with the pandemic, that some students with disabilities are not receiving the supports and services necessary to address their educational needs, including their disability- based behavior.

The new resources include:

The Minor’s Right to Confidentiality under Illinois Law

, , , , , , , , , , 0

Parents are often shocked at how much control their minor child has over their mental health records. In a post-dissolution of marriage proceeding, the petitioner mother sought to restrict the father’s parenting time with their minor child based on allegations that the father would continue to interfere with the medical services necessary for the child’s mental health. The father moved for production of the child’s medical, psychiatric, psychological, and school records, and the mother objected based on the child’s statutory privilege to keep the requested records confidential and objected to disclosing the records to his father. The trial court denied the father’s entire request for production of the child’s records. The Appellate Court addressed the issues that arise in the context of divorce and post-decree matters, specifically a minor’s right to deny access to his or her mental records, whether in the context of mental health treatment by private practitioners as well as in a therapeutic day school.

The minor was seeing a therapist and attended a therapeutic day school. Father sought both the entire school records as well as the private treatment provider’s records. Mother and the child representative were both in possession of the records. The minor objected to the disclosure of these records to the father.

The Appellate Court addressed two certified questions regarding these issues. The issues raised by the modified certified questions of law are whether a trial court, in a proceeding related to a petition to restrict parenting time under section 603.10 of the Marriage Act, (750 ILCS 5/603.10 (West 2018), where the allegations involve the mental health of a child who is at least 12 but under 18 years old, may deny a parent based on the provisions of the Confidentiality Act or the best interests of the child(1) the ability to discover otherwise relevant evidence concerning the child’s mental health and therapeutic school records on the ground that the child in question does not want the evidence disclosed to one parent; (2) the ability to discover the child’s medical records concerning the child’s mental health and school records from a therapeutic school even though those records are relevant to the proceedings and the parent is entitled to have access to those records pursuant to the parties’ allocation parental allocation judgment; and (3) access to the child’s mental health and therapeutic information that the child’s representative has reviewed.

The father in this case, argued that he wasn’t seeking records from the therapist but from his former wife. The court found that the father cannot avoid the effect of the child asserting his privilege against disclosure by seeking the documents from another source besides the therapist. The court further held that this privilege is not absolute and looked to the statute for clarity.
Section 4(a)(3) of the Confidentiality Act provides:
§ 4. (a) The following persons shall be entitled, upon request, to inspect and copy a recipient’s records or any part thereof:
(3) the parents of a recipient who is at least 12 but under 18 years, if the recipient is informed and does not object or if the therapist does not find that there are compelling reasons for denying the access. The parent or guardian who is denied access by either the recipient or the therapist may petition a court for access to the record. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to prohibit the parent or guardian of a recipient who is at least 12 but under 18 years of age from requesting and receiving the following information: current physical and mental condition, diagnosis, treatment needs, services provided, and services needed, including medication, if any [.] (Emphasis added.) 740 ILCS 110/4(a)(3) (West 2018).

The court ruled that the father in this case was entitled to the limited information that is outlined in the statute but nothing more after petitioning the court for that access. The fact that the entire record was disclosed to the mother, or the child representative does not nullify the child’s objection to the same information to the father.

The father also sought records from the therapeutic day school where his child attended asserting that he was entitled to education records under the terms of the Allocation Judgment. The court recognized the ambiguity created by the records kept by a therapeutic school and reasoned as follows:
Section 5(f)(1) of the Student Records Act recognizes the patient-therapist privilege and keeps confidential information communicated in confidence to a psychologist or other psychotherapist, school social worker, school counselor or school psychologist intern who works under the direct supervision of a school social worker, school counselor, or school psychologist. This list of protected communications includes information communicated in confidence to a teacher of an academic subject at a therapeutic school. 105 ILCS 10/5(f)(2) (West 2020). “Construing the provisions of the Student Records Act and the Confidentiality Act harmoniously, we conclude that privileged records and communications under the Confidentiality Act do not include a minor’s grades, grade level, academic assessments, and similar information, even if that child attends a therapeutic day school. Consequently, a trial court cannot deny a parent access under section 4(a)(3) of the Confidentiality Act access to the non-privileged school records of a minor child who attends a therapeutic day school, even if that child, who is at least 12 but under 18 years of age, objects to the parents request to inspect and copy those records. Furthermore, the trial court may conduct an in-camera review to ensure that the child’s therapeutic school’s records do not contain any privileged information concerning the child’s mental health services beyond the limited information regarding the child’s current physical and mental condition, diagnosis, treatment needs, services provided, and services needed, which the parent is entitled to receive. 740 ILCS 110/4(a)(3) (West 2018).

The Child and Family Law Center: Advocating for the Legal Rights of Children for over 25 years

, , , , , , , , , , , , 0

What does it take to win a Due Process Hearing?

A due process hearing is one of the mechanisms for resolving disputes regarding special education services between parents and school districts. Other less formal options such as mediation or a resolution session are available and typically occur before the parties go to a due process hearing. We make every effort to resolve disputes prior to going to a due process hearing. However, when it is not possible to resolve the issues a due process hearing may be necessary.

Parents often ask what it takes to win a due process hearing and this question is one that I have given a lot of thought to over the years. My answer is based on my experience litigating due process cases for over twenty-six years. Some of the answers may seem obvious while others may not. The following is a compilation of lessons learned as a parent’s attorney in these proceedings.

  1. The facts support the parent’s claim that their child was denied their rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”). There are many scenarios that meet this definition. Typically, the student has not received appropriate services, failed to make meaningful progress, or was not identified in a timely manner as a student with a disability. *
  2. The denial of these rights must rise to a denial of a free, appropriate, public education. Data supporting these arguments is a necessary element in a successful due process hearing.
  3. A well-organized parent who keeps good records is an asset in a hearing. Preparation from an attorney and collaboration with the family are essential.
  4. Documentation of the parental concerns to the school and evidence of the district’s failure to respond appropriately are often key elements in a hearing.
  5. The law supports the legal position that you are taking in the hearing. This is a complicated area of law that requires a knowledge of case law and prior decisions that provide guidance on the legal standards.
  6. Expert witnesses often determine whether a parent will prevail in a hearing.  Parent’s opinions are unlikely without some independent source, to persuade a hearing officer of their position. Choose experts carefully.
  7. The parent’s willingness to work with the school and to participate in the process even though there may an “agreement to disagree” on what is needed is a factor in hearing officer’s decisions.
  8. The ability to clearly articulate the relief you want from the hearing officer. Parents in conjunction with their legal counsel should be prepared to state very clearly what they want the school to do.
  9. At all times parents and legal counsel should behave in a professional manner.

Selected Resources:

http://wwwisbe.net/documents/parents-guide-special-ed-Aug.20pdf

If you are considering a due process action or simply want to discuss your child’s special education rights, please call our office at (312)-640-0500 and ask to speak to Micki Moran or email her at mmoran@grundlaw.com

Getting the Right Reading Intervention Shouldn’t Be So Hard

, , , , , , 0

It has been nearly 26 years since I started my practice with a focus on special education law and advocacy for children and adolescents. The practice is and was inspired and informed by my own son’s struggle with dyslexia. I was fortunate to have both the financial ability and resources to provide him with excellent research -based intervention. He learned to read using an Orton-Gillingham based approach. It was neither a fast nor easy solution. It worked. He is an avid reader and has a lifelong love of learning.

            After all this time the issue of reading intervention continues to be difficult for parents. Schools resist “labeling/identifying struggling readers as dyslexia. It is not uncommon for school systems to delay evaluations and interventions. Schools often do not utilize interventions that are researched based for students with specific learning disabilities relying on a patchwork of eclectic programs that depend on the skills or lack thereof a particular teacher and may even depend on what school a student attends in a district. This haphazard approach to something as basic as reading still surprises me. The science of reading intervention is not new. The Orton-Gillingham approach used 32 years that was implemented by my son’s reading teachers is hardly cutting edge and there is very little dispute that these interventions are needed and effective.

            Despite this fact, a common complaint from clients who seek our legal assistance has to do with the failure of their child’s school to agree to or even utilize research-based methodologies. Parents should push back when they are met with this resistance. Below, I have outlined a few tips for families who find themselves in this situation.

  1. Insist on an evaluation. If your school will not evaluate seek out a private comprehensive educational evaluation.
  2. Trust your gut. Parents often know there is a problem before the school does.
  3. Put every communication regarding your concerns to the school in writing.
  4. Track your child’s progress.
  5. Stay informed. [Resources to follow below]
  6. If the school takes a wait and see approach- agree on how long this period will last. Confirm that in writing.
  7. Agree on how progress or lack of progress will be monitored.
  8. Read with your child at home. The pandemic and school closures revealed deficits in reading that many parents were unaware of until their child was home and they saw the struggle first- hand.

Resources:

  • Dyslexia Handbook, Illinois State Board of Education, www.isbe.net

Divorce Checklist

, , , , , , , 0

It is not uncommon for someone to consult with our office when they are just beginning to contemplate the possibility of divorce. Often, they want basic information about the legal process and their rights as well as advice on how to prepare for such a major life event. My clients have found it helpful to have a checklist that they can have on hand as a reference. It has been my experience that being organized helps in developing a plan and is useful in calming some client’s anxiety. Below is a checklist and although it is something that may vary from case to case it does provide a framework for people contemplating divorce.

Checklist

  1. Your child or children’s names and dates of birth. If there are special needs considerations that will impact aspects of the divorce it is important that those are detailed to your lawyer.
  2. Date and location of marriage or civil union.
  3. Your spouse’s name and employer.
  4. Information regarding your spouse or your being self-employment where applicable.
  5. Your employer’s name. Current income.
  6. The last three years of your tax returns. Mortgage statements on the marital residence.
  7. A copy of any prenuptial or postnuptial agreements.
  8. A summary of your debts.
  9. Vehicles.
  10. A list of property including retirement accounts owed before the marriage.
  11. A list of property, including retirement accounts accumulated during the marriage.
  12. Expenses for the children. (e.g. tuition, camps, tutoring)
  13. Vacation property.
  14. A list of any stock, stock options or investment accounts.
  15. An estimated monthly budget that should include all costs including utilities, insurance. This is an important tool in determining what the financial future holds for you and your family.
  16. An inventory of the personal property in your home. (e.g. art, furniture, electronics)

Non-Financial Issues

  1.  Mental Health concerns for either party that will impact parenting time or decision making.
  2. Health concerns.
  3. Parenting Plan proposals.
  4. Decision Making (shared, sole)
  5.  Post-divorce plans and vision for what post-divorce life will look like for your family.

            Not all of these things will be resolved immediately. Divorce is a process. It is always best if the parties can work together on these matters but that isn’t always possible. Regardless of the posture of your case it is essential that both parties be fully informed about the financial and child related issues in order to make the best decisions for the family.

            If you are exploring the possibility of divorce, already committed to divorcing or have post-decree issues please feel free to contact our office for a free consultation. Our office is dedicated to advocating for the best outcomes for children and families. Call (312)-640-0500 or email me at mmoran@grundlaw.com.  Consultations are available in person or by Zoom. Safety protocols are followed.

WHAT TO DO IF YOUR CHILD IS ARRESTED?

, , , , , , , , , , , , , 0

Summer is upon us and as a general rule this is a time when our office gets calls from parents regarding their teenager or young adults arrest or questioning by police.

Have this discussion now. One time is not enough. Here are some Frequently Asked Questions that I hope will educate you and your teenager.

What should my teenager do if they are stopped by the police?

  • Be respectful.
  • Keep your hands out of your pocket and visible to the police.
  • Tell your child to provide his or her identification to the officer when asked.
  • Provide the insurance information and registration if they are driving.
  • Give them the name of your parents.
  • Politely but firmly indicate that they have been told by their parents not to answer any questions. Ask them to call your parents or an attorney. Have them state that they will not answer any questions. This is hard for most young people. It is very common even when they know that they shouldn’t talk to the police for them to give great detail or even sign a written statement. Police can be intimidating and often will promise that if the young person tells them what happened they won’t be arrested.
  • The police are not your friend.

Do I have to be present if my child is questioned? Not necessarily. Students are often questioned at school and describe to school officials the details of the incident. They are not “in custody”. Students should be instructed to ask to call a parent before being questioned at school.

However, Illinois law requires police to “immediately make a reasonable attempt to notify the parent” after a minor is taken into custody.

Should I consult an attorney? The answer is yes. The stakes are high and parents should not attempt to play lawyer. Be very cautious about urging your child to tell an officer everything and as a result waiving their rights. This isn’t the time to teach your child a lesson.

Can my teenager or young adult with a disability be arrested? Yes.

How can I prepare my child? If your child has a disability it is essential that you prepare them for interactions for police contact. Parents are often shocked that their child with autism or other developmental disabilities can be questioned by police and arrested. Some families I work with have a script that their teen can practice regarding police contact. It is helpful that this “script” include a checklist of what to do. Autism/Advocacy Network aane.org has a downloadable wallet card that an individual with autism can carry and provide to police.

If your child has been arrested, ticketed, or you are concerned that they will be facing legal consequences please call our office for a consultation at (312)-640-0500.            

Load More

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: